Source: Axel Rauschmayer survey on favorite ES6 features
Source: Ponyfoo’s survey on the most commonly used ES6 features
The good news is that many major modern browsers support the use of arrow functions.
This post will cover the details of arrow functions — how to use them, common syntaxes, common use cases, and gotchas/pitfalls.
Arrow functions – also called “fat arrow” functions, from CoffeeScript (a transcompiled language) — are a more concise syntax for writing function expressions. They utilize a new token, =>
, that looks like a fat arrow. Arrow functions are anonymous and change the way this
binds in functions.
Arrow functions make our code more concise, and simplify function scoping and the this keyword. They are one-line mini functions which work much like Lambdas in other languages like C# or Python. (See also lambdas in JavaScript). By using arrow functions, we avoid having to type the function
keyword, return
keyword (it’s implicit in arrow functions), and curly brackets.
There are a variety of syntaxes available in arrow functions, of which MDN has a thorough list. We’ll cover the common ones here to get you started. Let’s compare how ES5 code with function expressions can now be written in ES6 using arrow functions.
// (param1, param2, paramN) => expression
// ES5
var multiplyES5 = function(x, y) {
return x * y;
};
// ES6
const multiplyES6 = (x, y) => { return x * y };
The arrow function example above allows a developer to accomplish the same result with fewer lines of code and approximately half the typing.
Curly brackets aren’t required if only one expression is present. The preceding example could also be written as:
const multiplyES6 = (x, y) => x * y;
Parentheses are optional when only one parameter is present
//ES5
var phraseSplitterEs5 = function phraseSplitter(phrase) {
return phrase.split(' ');
};
//ES6
const phraseSplitterEs6 = phrase => phrase.split(" ");
console.log(phraseSplitterEs6("ES6 Awesomeness")); // ["ES6", "Awesomeness"]
Parentheses are required when no parameters are present.
//ES5
var docLogEs5 = function docLog() {
console.log(document);
};
//ES6
var docLogEs6 = () => { console.log(document); };
docLogEs6(); // #document... <html> ….
Arrow functions, like function expressions, can be used to return an object literal expression. The only caveat is that the body needs to be wrapped in parentheses, in order to distinguish between a block and an object (both of which use curly brackets).
//ES5
var setNameIdsEs5 = function setNameIds(id, name) {
return {
id: id,
name: name
};
};
// ES6
var setNameIdsEs6 = (id, name) => ({ id: id, name: name });
console.log(setNameIdsEs6 (4, "Kyle")); // Object {id: 4, name: "Kyle"}
Now that we’ve covered the basic syntaxes, let’s get into how arrow functions are used.
One common use case for arrow functions is array manipulation and the like. It’s common that you’ll need to map or reduce an array. Take this simple array of objects:
const smartPhones = [
{ name:'iphone', price:649 },
{ name:'Galaxy S6', price:576 },
{ name:'Galaxy Note 5', price:489 }
];
We could create an array of objects with just the names or prices by doing this in ES5:
// ES5
var prices = smartPhones.map(function(smartPhone) {
return smartPhone.price;
});
console.log(prices); // [649, 576, 489]
An arrow function is more concise and easier to read:
// ES6
const prices = smartPhones.map(smartPhone => smartPhone.price);
console.log(prices); // [649, 576, 489]
Here’s another example using the array filter method:
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15];
// ES5
var divisibleByThrreeES5 = array.filter(function (v){
return v % 3 === 0;
});
// ES6
const divisibleByThrreeES6 = array.filter(v => v % 3 === 0);
console.log(divisibleByThrreeES6); // [3, 6, 9, 12, 15]
Code that makes use of asynchronous callbacks or promises often contains a great deal of function
and return
keywords. When using promises, these function expressions will be used for chaining. Here’s a simple example of chaining promises from the MSDN docs:
// ES5
aAsync().then(function() {
returnbAsync();
}).then(function() {
returncAsync();
}).done(function() {
finish();
});
This code is simplified, and arguably easier to read using arrow functions:
// ES6
aAsync().then(() => bAsync()).then(() => cAsync()).done(() => finish);
Arrow functions should similarly simplify callback-laden NodeJS code.
What’s the meaning of this?!
The other benefit of using arrow functions with promises/callbacks is that it reduces the confusion surrounding the this
keyword. In code with multiple nested functions, it can be difficult to keep track of and remember to bind the correct this
context. In ES5, you can use workarounds like the .bind
method (which is slow) or creating a closure using var self = this;
.
Because arrow functions allow you to retain the scope of the caller inside the function, you don’t need to create self = this
closures or use bind.
Developer Jack Franklin provides an excellent practical example of using the arrow function lexical this
to simplify a promise:
Without Arrow functions, the promise code needs to be written something like this:
// ES5
API.prototype.get = function(resource) {
var self = this;
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
http.get(self.uri + resource, function(data) {
resolve(data);
});
});
};
Using an arrow function, the same result can be achieved more concisely and clearly:
// ES6
API.prototype.get = function(resource) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
http.get(this.uri + resource, function(data) {
resolve(data);
});
});
};
You can use function expressions if you need a dynamic this
and arrow functions for a lexical this
.
The new arrow functions bring a helpful function syntax to ECMAScript, but as with any new feature, they come with their own pitfalls and gotchas.
Kyle Simpson, a JavaScript developer and writer, felt there were enough pitfalls with Arrow Functions to warrant this flow chart when deciding to use them. He argues there are too many confusing rules/syntaxes with arrow functions. Others have suggested that using arrow functions saves typing but ultimately makes code more difficult to read. All those function
and return
statements might make it easier to read multiple nested functions or just function expressions in general.
Developer opinions vary on just about everything, including arrow functions. For the sake of brevity, here are a couple things you need to watch out for when using arrow functions.
As was mentioned previously, the this
keyword works differently in arrow functions. The methods call(), apply(), and bind() will not change the value of this
in arrow functions. (In fact, the value of this
inside a function simply can’t be changed; it will be the same value as when the function was called.) If you need to bind to a different value, you’ll need to use a function expression.
Arrow functions can’t be used as constructors as other functions can. Don’t use them to create similar objects as you would with other functions. If you attempt to use new
with an arrow function, it will throw an error. Arrow functions, like built-in functions (aka methods), don’t have a prototype property or other internal methods. Because constructors are generally used to create class-like objects in JavaScript, you should use the new ES6 classes instead.
Arrow functions are designed to be lightweight and can’t be used as generators. Using the yield
keyword in ES6 will throw an error. Use ES6 generators instead.
Arrow functions don’t have the local variable arguments
as do other functions. The arguments object is an array-like object that allows developers to dynamically discover and access a function’s arguments. This is helpful because JavaScript functions can take an unlimited number of arguments. Arrow functions do not have this object.
Arrow functions have been called one of the quickest wins with ES6. Developer Lars Schöning lays out how his team decided where to use arrow functions:
function
in the global scope and for Object.prototype
properties.class
for object constructors.=>
everywhere else.Arrow functions, like let and const, will likely become the default functions unless function expressions or declarations are necessary. To get a sense for how much arrow functions can be used, Kevin Smith, counted function expressions in various popular libraries/frameworks and found that roughly 55% of function expressions would be candidates for arrow functions.
Arrow functions are here: they’re powerful, concise, and developers love them. Perhaps it’s time for you to start using them!
This article is part of the web development series from Microsoft and DevelopIntelligence on practical JavaScript learning, open-source projects, and interoperability best practices including Microsoft Edge browser and the new EdgeHTML rendering engine. DevelopIntelligence offers instructor-led JavaScript Training, AngularJS Training and other Web Development Training for technical teams and organizations.
We encourage you to test across browsers and devices including Microsoft Edge — the default browser for Windows 10 — with free tools on dev.microsoftedge.com:
More in-depth learning from our engineers and evangelists:
Our community open source projects:
More free tools and back-end web dev stuff:
Or take the following course:
☞ JavaScript programming: JavaScript for beginners
☞ Projects In JavaScript & JQuery
☞ Javascript for Beginners Learn by Doing Practical Exercises
☞ Learn How To Become a JavaScript Developer from Scratch
☞ Javascript - From Beginner to Pro! - Build real world apps
☞ JavaScript Programming Tutorial Full Course for Beginners
☞ JavaScript for React Developers | Mosh
☞ Learn JavaScript - Become a Zero to Hero
☞ Javascript Project Tutorial: Budget App
☞ E-Commerce JavaScript Tutorial - Shopping Cart from Scratch